After a miserable decade of austerity and inequality, how did the Tories get re-elected?

How Britain voted 2019 age-01

Voting preferences according to age in the 2019 general election.

I’m writing a series of articles about the general election results in December. I’m looking for opinions on this topic. 

If you’re interested in writing about the election, drop me a message here at Politics and Insights.

George Monbiot’s view

George Monbiot says:  “Something has changed: not just in the UK and the US, but in many parts of the world. A new politics, funded by oligarchs, built on sophisticated cheating and provocative lies, using dark ads and conspiracy theories on social media, has perfected the art of persuading the poor to vote for the interests of the very rich. We must understand what we are facing, and the new strategies required to resist it.

“When the same thing happens in many nations, it’s time to recognise the pattern, and see that heaping blame on particular people and parties fixes nothing.

“In these nations, people you wouldn’t trust to post a letter for you have been elected to the highest office. There, as widely predicted, they behave like a gang of vandals given the keys to an art gallery, “improving” the great works in their care with spray cans, box cutters and lump hammers. In the midst of global emergencies, they rip down environmental protections and climate agreements, and trash the regulations that constrain capital and defend the poor.

“They wage war on the institutions that are supposed to restrain their powers while, in some cases, committing extravagant and deliberate outrages against the rule of law. They use impunity as a political weapon, revelling in their ability to survive daily scandals, any one of which would destroy a normal politician.”

Monbiot proposes a new model of politics which he calls political ‘rewilding.’

You can read more about Monbiot’s proposal in his article – There is an antidote to demagoguery – it’s called political rewilding.

Ian Mclauchlin’s view

The second view on the outcome of the election is a guest post (below) by my friend and fellow campaigner Ian Mclauchlin, reflecting his own justified suspicion of a “new politics, funded by oligarchs, built on sophisticated cheating and provocative lies, using dark ads and conspiracy theories on social media, has perfected the art of persuading the poor to vote for the interests of the very rich.”

He says: “I’ve been dismayed to see that the world seems to be going from bad to worse. Rogues are elected and there’s a suspicion (in my mind at least) that it’s happened not always by fair means. They’ve been doing the ‘wrong’ thing almost as a matter of course and getting away with it. Their values are not my values. etc. 

How could this be? Why, in recent times, have we been saddled with particularly unsavoury and incompetent leaders?

If you accept for a moment that they’ve been given all the votes that they seem to have been given, why would people vote like that? For the obviously retrograde and the dangerous?

Well ask yourself what’s changed. In the last 15 years or so, but especially the last 10, Social Media have become available and increasingly heavily used. That’s given those who previously didn’t have a voice the opportunity to find their voice. Not only have they found it, but realised that it can be spread around the world. It’s then amplified by sharing and comments by like minded people. That doesn’t mean it’s the right voice, nor does it mean it’s a correct analysis. But the proponents ‘think’ that it is. So what follows?

What follows is that the bigoted, uneducated, prejudiced and intellectually challenged have found that they can spread their ‘opinions’ – often gained by  accepting with gullibility what they’re told to think by the newspapers they choose to read – far and wide. They then think that their opinions are worth more than they are. Social media amplify those opinions and recipients believe that they’re majority opinions so, like sheep, adopt them as their own!

And Political Parties of dubious morality (are there any other kind?) haven’t been slow to notice this and have deliberately muddied the social media waters accordingly for their own ends, thereby adding to the amplification and the wrong thinking. And so they’re complicit in it all and need to be held to account for that reason alone.

That’s one explanation anyway, in the face of the otherwise inexplicable and downright perverse . . . .

____

So what do you think happened? Ian is right about government and the media’s unrelentingly ruthless lies, dishonesty and disinformation strategies in the run up to the election and the sheer gullibility of the working class, who have apparently voted for more of the same retrogressive policies that have made their lives more difficult and precarious over the last decade.

In my next article in this series I’m exploring how social psychology may play a part in the rise in populism – a political approach that strives (on the surface, at least) to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups, nationalism and authoritarianism, especially in societies where people experience high levels of socioeconomic inequality.  Unfortunately, many people often mistake authoritarian leaders for ‘strong’ ones.

They’re not. Authoritarians are invariably all mouth, lots of slogans and no democracy.

The despised elite has ignored the public in the UK for the last decade has just been returned to office by the same public, as if people expect that voting for more of the same will somehow yield different results and benefit them personally, this time. Unless people really thought the elite was not this particular elite who are not a fundamental part of the establishment…

The electorate has absolutely no grounds whatsoever for the belief that things will improve, and there is plenty of evidence over the past ten years which shows how the Conservatives have not got working class interests at heart.

It seems that many people were quite happy to forego both an interest based and evidence-based decision on how to vote in 2019. 

How Britain voted 2019 education level-01


Educational attainment and voting preferences in the last general election.


 

Politics and Insight’s independent, measured, authoritative reporting has never been so vital, or in the public interest. These are turbulent, decade-defining times. Whatever lies ahead for us all, I will be with you – investigating, disentangling, analysing and scrutinising, as I have done for the last 9 years. 

More people, like you, are reading and supporting independent, investigative and in particular, public interest journalism, than ever before.

I don’t make any money from my research and writing, and want to ensure my work remains accessible to all.

I have engaged with the most critical issues of our time – the often devastating impact of almost a decade of Conservative policies, widespread inequality to the influence of big tech on our lives. At a time when factual information is a necessity, I believe that each of us, around the world, deserves access to accurate reporting with integrity and the norms of democracy at its heart. 

My editorial independence means I set my own agenda and present my own research and analyisis.  My work is absolutely free from commercial and political interference and not influenced one iota by billionaire media barons.  I have worked hard to give a voice to those less heard, I have explored where others turn away, and always rigorously challenge those in power, holding them to account.

My first step to fight back this year is to join the National Union of Journalists (NUJ) as soon as I can afford to. It is an essential protection, now.

It’s not cheap, especially for someone like me, as I’ve no income from my work. I pay WordPress to keep adverts off my site, too. But I am one of those people who often has to make daily choices about whether to eat or keep warm. I am disabled because of an illness called lupus. Like many others in similar circumstances, I am now living in fear for our future under a government that has already systematically and gravely violated the human rights of disabled people, which has resulted in fear, suffering, harm and all too often, premature death.

I hope you will consider supporting me today, or whenever you can. As independent writers, we will all need your support to keep delivering quality research and journalism that’s open and independent.

Every reader contribution, however big or small, is so valuable and helps keep me going. 

DonatenowButton

18 thoughts on “After a miserable decade of austerity and inequality, how did the Tories get re-elected?

  1. I disagree with George in so much as he conflates Clinton and Corbyn, there’s a massive difference between her and him and the reasons why people didn’t vote for each of them, you only have to note her actions towards Gabbard & Sanders to see that, the rest of his analysis I broadly agree with. I thought Ian was spot on and it’s something difficult to counter, there’s a quote attributed to Mark Twain (although that’s contested) “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled.”
    If we can encourage people to use their critical thinking instead of how they “feel” about something then, only then will we break this grip those that manipulate and propagandise for power and greed have over the population. M

    Liked by 1 person

    1. George did acknowledge that Clinton and Corbyn are nothing alike.

      The Tories are masters at manipulating feeling, but don’t engage on a rational level – hence their prolific use of simple slogans. Yo’d think people would have learned to pay more attention to detail after the last decade of being conned. I’m beginning to think that lots of people simply don’t think critically, they like to be spoonfed by the extremely unreliable right wing baron press media instead and can’t be bothered participating in democracy, other than voting once every few years.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I didn’t mind the thought of A Brexit (though I voted remain), but only as long as it was a Labour one, OBVIOUSLY, with the freedom to nationalise industries at will, etc. ANYONE who thought any good Brexit would be delivered by the Tories deserves everything they (and sadly everyone else) will get.

        It took a toxic mixture of cynical propaganda exploiting a lack of political/voter consciousness and sheer bloody-minded determination to be heard, to the point of willing self-harm, to produce this result. I agree with Monbiot & Graeber. The oligarchs have figured out how to game democracy. THIS is what we must face and respond to.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. The reason for the last election result is very simple: immigration. The arrival of literally millions of immigrants, of differing religions, cultures and languages, over the past twenty years was too many in too short a space of time. It is the reason for Brexit. Boris Johnson tapped into the resentment felt by the working class who have seen rents and house prices skyrocket and their standard of living drop. The Tories exploited the feeling of alienation felt by many of the indigenous population, who were not asked if they wanted to become a multicultural society, and greatly resented being called racist when they voiced their objections to having their housing and jobs taken by immigrants. It is useless to tell people that immigrants contribute greatly to the UK on all levels, which , of course, they do, if they cannot find somewhere to live that they can afford or cannot find decent employment (or any employment at all). It is useless to tell people that multiculturalism creates a vibrant community if you cannot talk to any of your neighbours because they don’t speak English and seemingly have no intention of doing so because they have recreated their own ‘country’ within yours. This is what enormous numbers of the English think and are experiencing. It is no coincidence that the northern seats that fell to the Tories were, in the main, those that have experienced the greatest influx of immigrants. It is scapegoating but until the Labour Party see a way of counteracting this I fear they are doomed to fail – and as a Labour supporter it grieves me greatly.

    Like

    1. You know as well as I do that it is austerity and privatisation of our public services by the Tories – who have been in office for a decade – those in power who make these policies that causes hardship for citizens, not migrants. Until people stop believing rubbish, start thinking a little more critically and finding things out for themselves – you know, actually participating in a democracy instead of being spoonfed by a divisive, dishonest right wing media – then they will continue to get the awful government they deserve.

      Who will these people blame once Brexit is done and dusted?

      Like

      1. ‘Who will these people blame once Brexit is done and dusted?’ something the weak minded are very god at is finding someone to blame for all their perceived misfortunes. My bet is they will continue blaming the Eu for as long as possible

        Like

    1. There’s no censorship. Your original comment has been published and had a response. That isn’t ‘censorship’. Censorship is when people are not allowed to have their say.

      Everyone has a right to have a say, unless the comment is very offensive of course. I reserve the right to ensure my readers are not subjected to abuse. However, no-one has the right to express a view that remains unchallenged. People are free to disagree. That’s what reasoned debate is.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Kitty, I’m 68 and it pains and puzzles me that my generation in great numbers voted for Brexit and for Boris Johnson. They might not give a damn about my grandchildren’s future but what about their own? It appalls me that we who benefited so much from the post-War welfare state, university grants and the possibility of owning a home at an early age should for dubious reasons sabotage the prospects of the young,by voting in a government of the privileged and self-interested. I just hope that we learn from these great errors and emerge in a few years determined to re-build a far better and more inclusive society – and I hope I’m still around to see it happening…

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s