Labour pledges to stem the tide of women’s refuge closures



By .

Theresa May and the Home Office are turning a blind eye to the crisis in safe haven provision caused public service cuts

‘Today, on the International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women, I am deeply worried that the clock is being turned back.’ 

 A few weeks ago an emergency housing officer made a late night call to the domestic violence helpline run by Women’s Aid and Refuge. He was trying to find refuge accommodation for Violet (names in this piece have been changed), a 19-year-old who had escaped abuse with her twin babies. She had nowhere else to turn.

There was refuge space for Violet and her children in a neighbouring county, far from her abuser, where she would be safe. However, a new rule capped the number of women they could take from outside their area. The bed was left empty and they turned her away.

Today, on the International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women, as I hear more stories like Violet’s, I am deeply worried that the clock is being turned back. Instead of the improvements we need in the criminal justice system and local services, the opposite is happening. As home secretary, Theresa May’s policies are letting women down, and it’s time for urgent change.

Shockingly, the national network of refuges is starting to crumble before our eyes. Britain was one of the first countries to pioneer safe houses for those fleeing violence. More than a million women and hundreds of thousands of men experience domestic violence every year. And women can be at greatest risk when they make the brave decision to leave. Refuges provide a vital safe haven with expert support and sanctuary to help families get back on their feet and start rebuilding their lives.

That network is now under terrible strain. Women’s Aid estimates that 155 women and 103 children are turned away from refuges every day. And services are closing. Many are using their reserve funding to stay open and some areas have no refuge provision left at all. In the face of big budget cuts, some councils have brought in the “local connections” rule to ring-fence their funding for local women. Yet this is putting more women at risk.

Lorna is convinced that moving saved her life. She suffered persistent beatings and sexual abuse by her partner. Her employer helped her move to another branch of the business in another town without telling anyone where she had gone. But she couldn’t have managed it without temporary supportive accommodation near the other branch office. Violet and her twins did not have the same option. They were forced to take emergency accommodation in the very area she was trying to flee from.

Specialist support is being lost too. Some areas are only funding generic accommodation or help in victims’ own homes – ending the expert support and sanctuary that some families need.

So what is the Home Office doing about it? Where are the national standards? What is Theresa May doing to protect women’s safety? Or to make sure that local councils work together so women’s safety isn’t disproportionately hit?

Too often this government is just turning a blind eye. What is happening to refuges reflects a wider and deeper problem. Labour’s women’s safety commission has been gathering evidence from across the country, and time and again it has heard that women’s safety is being hit disproportionately and justice is being undermined. The proportion of rape and domestic violence cases reaching prosecution is falling, not rising. Specialist prosecutors for rape have been cut back, domestic violence courts are closing, and specialist police officers are overstretched. Mothers fleeing violence are struggling to get legal aid. Families with police-backed security and panic rooms at home are being charged the bedroom tax and told to move.

Yet amazingly, the government has no idea of the cumulative impact their policies are having on women’s safety, because they haven’t carried out a proper audit in the face of huge upheaval. Lack of Home Office interest or intervention and lack of national standards at a time of big budget cuts, are letting women down.

A Labour government would use £3m of the savings made from abolishing police and crime commissioners to set up a national refuge fund and we will continue national support for rape crisis centres too. We will bring in new local and national standards for policing, prosecutions and support services and a new national commissioner to make sure standards are met, as well as strengthening the law. And perhaps most important of all, we will insist on action to prevent violence in the next generation. This government has voted repeatedly to block our proposal for compulsory sex and relationship education to teach zero tolerance of violence in relationships among growing girls and boys.

Across the world, other governments, charities, criminal justice organisations, councils and community campaigners are marking 16 days of action to eliminate violence against women. It is time our government stopped turning its back and did far more to keep women safe.

See also:

“The report highlights the key areas where women’s rights in the UK have come to a standstill and in fact some are being reversed” – UK Government still in breach of the human rights convention on gender discrimination.

Welfare reforms and the language of flowers: the Tory gender agenda.

Thanks to Robert Livingstone for the pictures

10 thoughts on “Labour pledges to stem the tide of women’s refuge closures

  1. I would have sympathy but i was illegally kicked out of my home and had nowhere to live. I told all the organisations my dilemma and got nowhere. I had to put my 2 sons in care and was homeless (12 years) and got on the best i could. Some of these organisations said they couldn’t help me for 1 reason and 1 reason only. i was a man. I am extremely bitter and always will be. If i had turn to crime i wouldn’t have had a problem when i got released out of prison would’ve got somewhere to live no problem.


    1. This isn’t about re-housing priorities, though I do understand that what constitutes a ‘priority’ makes it difficult for single people who become homeless. Because you had children, your local council ought to have given you priority on the housing list, and I don’t know why that didn’t happen. Legally, having dependents, rather than your gender, makes you a housing priority.

      However, this article isn’t about rehousing as such, it is about refuges for women and children whose lives are endangered. Around 2 women every week are killed by violent partners. I’ve been illegally turned out of my home, too, in fact I have ended up homeless twice, now. But that does not compare to my experiences of domestic violence. I was thrown against a wall, hung from the beams in the loft with a piece of washing line and finally, almost lethally stabbed in the neck. If it wasn’t for the local women’s refuge, I wouldn’t be alive today to tell you about it. My ex-husband threw one of his subsequent partners from a multi-story block of flats and killed her.


  2. Reblogged this on Beastrabban’s Weblog and commented:
    This is horrific in and of itself, but at the heart of it is a cavalier, deeply misogynistic attitude amongst the Tories and UKIP. Several UKIP politicians have gone on record to say that it is all right to give women ‘a bit of a slap’, or words to that effect. In the European parliament, UKIP MEPs have either abstained from voting for measures outlawing violence against women, such as banning rape within marriage, or have actively voted against it.

    I remember when domestic violence against women – wife beating – first became a major issue in the 1970s. There were horrific reports about it on the 6 O’clock news and documentary programmes like Panorama and Nationwide. The latter was a light news/ topical issues programme pretty much like The One Show. Major figures in UKIP in particular have said many times that they believe women should return to their domestic role in the home, a sentiment also loudly shared by the Daily Mail. The Right would clearly like to turn the clock back on women’s issues before the 1970s. This article shows you what that means in practice, in contrast to the supposedly ‘pro-family’ arguments of UKIP and the Tories.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s