UN officials to visit UK over coming months to investigate whether Iain Duncan Smith’s “reforms” to disability benefits are compatible with Human Rights


I reported last year that the UK has become the first country to face a United Nations inquiry into disability rights violations. A formal investigation was launched by the United Nation’s Committee regarding the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

Officials from the United Nation’s Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities are to visit Britain after the Tories announced a wave of new austerity measures, including slashing disability benefits by a further £30 a week.

Thousands of sick and disabled people claiming Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) are to have their weekly payment cut from £102.15 to £73.10, which is the same amount as jobseekers’ allowance, if they are assessed as being able to undertake “work-related activity”. Bearing in mind that in order to claim ESA in the first place, prior to assessment, a doctor has already deemed this group of people unfit for work, the move to cut lifeline benefits further is especially cruel and inhumane.

We signed up to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities under the last Labour government. On 8 June 2009, the UK government ratified the Convention, signaling its commitment to take concrete action to comply with the legal rights and obligations contained in the Convention. The Government also ratified the Convention’s Optional Protocol.

The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is a side-agreement to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. It was adopted on 13 December 2006, and entered into force at the same time as its parent Convention on 3 May 2008. As of July 2015, it has 92 signatories and 87 state parties.

The Optional Protocol establishes an individual complaints mechanism for the Convention similar to that of other Conventions. But this Protocol also accepts individual rights on economic, social and cultural rights. Parties agree to recognise the competence of the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities to consider complaints from individuals or groups who claim their rights under the Convention have been violated. The Committee can request information from and make recommendations to a party.

In addition, parties may also permit the Committee to investigate, report on and make recommendations on “grave or systematic violations” of the Convention.

In December 2014, the UN Human Rights Council created the role of UN Special Rapporteur on the rights of persons with disabilities. Part of the Special Rapporteur’s broad mandate is to report annually to the Human Rights Council and General Assembly with recommendations on how to better promote and protect the rights of persons with disabilities.

The Special Rapporteur chose to focus her first report on a thematic inquiry into the right to social security, globally. The report will be published in October 2015.

The Commission’s response focuses on three areas from the UK that are highly relevant to the Special Rapporteur’s inquiry:

  • The impact of reforms to the UK’s social security system on disabled people’s rights to independence and to an adequate standard of living;
  • Whether the design and delivery of health and social care services in England is consistent with the rights to physical and mental health, independent living and freedom from cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; and
  • The impact of reforms affecting access to civil law justice in England and Wales on disabled people’s right to effective access to justice.

The Commission’s response to the UN Special Rapporteur’s inquiry into persons with disabilities right to social security can be found here.

The Disability Convention requires governments to designate one or more independent mechanisms to “promote, protect and monitor implementation” of the Convention.

The Commission, which is Britain’s National Human Rights Institution, has been designated alongside the Scottish Human Rights Commission, the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission and the Northern Ireland Equality Commission to fulfill this role in UK.

The Sunday Herald has more recently reported that UN officials will visit the UK in the next few months to investigate whether Iain Duncan Smith’s welfare “reforms” have led to “grave or systematic violations” of disabled people’s human rights.  According to the Scottish Herald, a leading Scottish disability charity has been advised that a visit by the Special Rapporteur and members of the Committee on the rights of persons with disabilities is expected in the “near future”.

United Nations (UN) investigations are conducted confidentially, I’ve already submitted reports and evidence regarding the impact of the welfare “reforms” on sick and disabled people. I’ve mostly focussed on the withdrawal of the Independent Living Fund (ILF), the adverse consequences of the Work Capability Assessment, workfare and sanctions.

Anyone wishing to make a submission may contact the UN here:

Catalina Devandas Aguilar
Special rapporteur on the rights of persons with disabilities
Address: OHCHR-UNOG; CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
Email: sr.disability@ohchr.org

The Department of Work and Pensions have refused to comment regarding the inquiry.

Shocking statistics published by the Department of Work and Pensions last week showed thousands of people have died after being declared “fit for work”. The figures, which did not detail the cause of the deaths, revealed that at least 2,380 people died between December 2011 and February 2014 within six weeks of a work capability assessment (WCA), which found them found them fit for work.

Bill Scott, director of policy at Inclusion Scotland, a consortium of disability organisations, said: “The UN have notified us they will be visiting Britain to investigate … and want to meet with us when they come, sometime in the next few months.”

Inclusion Scotland has also made a submission to the study being prepared by the Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Catalina Devandas-Aguilar, which is examining the right of disabled people to social protection.

In the submission, Inclusion Scotland warned that the UK Government’s welfare reforms are “jeopardising disabled people’s right to life” by increasing the risk of suicide after loss of benefits. Last week, the Sunday Herald revealed that DWP staff had been given official guidance on how to deal with suicidal claimants left penniless after suffering benefit sanctions.

The Inclusion Scotland submission also highlights a series of shocking findings, including that disabled people in some areas of Scotland are waiting for up to ten months to access Personal Independent Payment (PIP) disability benefits, due to delays in assessments taking place.

Dr Simon Duffy, director of think tank The Centre for Welfare Reform, said independent research carried out since 2010 had shown the UK Government has targeted cuts mostly at people in poverty and people with disabilities. Disabled people have been targeted by cuts nine times more than other citizens. It also found that people with disabilities, who make up one in 13 of the population, bore almost a third (29%) of the cuts.

He added:

In fact the people with the most severe disabilities have faced cuts several times greater than those faced by cuts to the average citizen. This policy has been made even worse by processes of assessment and sanctions that are experienced as stigmatising and bullying.

The government has utterly failed to find jobs for the people they target – people who are often very sick, who have disabilities or who have mental health problems.

Instead we are seeing worrying signs that they are increasing rates of illness, suicide and poverty.

Many disabled people’s rights campaigners, such as Samuel Miller, Robert LivingstoneMike Sivier and myself, amongst others, welcome this development. Many  campaigners and organisations have made submissions to the UN, using the Optional Protocol mechanism. As I’ve said elsewhere, our political freedoms and human rights must not be subservient to Tory notions of economic success. Democracy is not about the private accumulation of wealth. It is about the wise use of the collective wealth for the common good of the public – that must extend to include ALL of our citizens. And a decent, civilised, democratic society supports its vulnerable members and upholds universal human rights.

Disabled people have been stigmatised, scapegoated and subjected to cuts in their lifeline support because of the financial mistakes and poor decision-making of government.

We need to ask why our Government has so far refused to instigate or agree an inquiry into the substantial rise in deaths amongst sick and disabled people, as these deaths are so clearly correlated with policy changes.  Or why a cumulative impact assessment has not been carried out regarding the consequences of these extremely draconian policies.


Pictures courtesy of Robert Livingstone, used with thanks

41 thoughts on “UN officials to visit UK over coming months to investigate whether Iain Duncan Smith’s “reforms” to disability benefits are compatible with Human Rights

  1. A positive move, but I am sceptical about the UN coming up with anything which will damage Duncan Smith or the Nasty Party itself.


    1. At the very least, there will be an official record of abuses of human rights at an international level. In a wealthy, first-world liberal democracy, that ought to be damage enough for the public.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I am pleased the SNP are to be involved.If I am correct in thinking they appose most of what the tory has done. Nicola Sturgent will make noises if only to bring attention to their party. every faith in her.


  3. Did the UN not have a similar investigation happen with regards the the bedroom tax and they deemed it in humane? Yet we still have the bedroom tax.


      1. Then why has it not been scrapped? Do the UN not have teeth? I was lucky. I escaped the bedroom tax, but unlucky in the fact that I am still trying to make the one bedroom flat that moved to into a home. It was a shit hole when I moved in, but the best of a bad bunch of places on offer at the time.


  4. I probably could ask a Tory we have enough of them where I live. Tory bloody council. which I never vote for btw. Been labour all my life. My late father was to. Worked for the post office and then BT when it went private.

    I just find it infuriating that The UN doe these investigations, present their conclusions and sod all is done.


    1. At least we have a record on an international level, and this can be used to bring individual cases against the government – the law of remedies is one way we can use the investigation report: “It is a settled and invariable principle in the laws of England, that every right when withheld must have a remedy, and every injury its proper redress.”


  5. Pingback: Worldtruth
  6. I wrote this in August, it published on Aug 30th

    On September 6th, this appeared in the Guardian – http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/sep/16/disability-un-investigation-uk-government-violations-human-rights

    Yeah, there’s a startling similarity in content, even the reference to Dr Simon Duffy’s work, and the commentary explaining the Optional Protocol. (From here: https://kittysjones.wordpress.com/2013/06/16/briefing-on-how-cuts-are-targeted-dr-simon-duffy/ )

    Many independent campaigners and organisations have been submitting reports and evidence to the UN, myself included, over the last few years. It is wrong to take all of the credit for the work of others, too. It’s divisive, not inclusive, nor is it what we are supposed to be about. Solidarity.


  7. Well, I do sincerely hope that it does include the Bedroom Tax AGAIN….. I help run a BT appeal group. And hear everyday on the effects of the BT on peoples lives. Including, the Disabled. I am one of them, myself. There are no smaller properties to move to. Especially, already adapted for their individual needs. We are supposed to move from a property that has already been adapted for US. Costing thousands of pounds. And, in the small print it states if you move within 5 years, you may be liable to pay. So, we are penalised in every which way. We are supposed to leave somewhere, where all our support systems are. The basic human right to live in your HOME without all this stress. Having to go to Tribunals to gain an exemption. This has caused mental health issues. And, making people ill. It has also, caused some people to commit suicide. And, yet this government don’t give a toss. And are allowed to get away with it. Amongst all the other huge issues we have to cope with. As, referenced in the above article.
    This, investigation is going to take a long time. And, I greatly feel, it will be far to late for many……….

    Liked by 2 people

  8. The DWP do not liase interdepartmental. I asked for a MR and stated I would be writing in. They’ve gone ahead with the MR without my letter, without my up to date evidence and a report from an ATOS NURSE which was based on misrepresentation of what I said at assessment

    Liked by 1 person

    1. That sounds pretty typical. I hope it is sorted for you, though, and that your evidence is considered. The DWP and ministers often claim appeals are later won because they consider “new” evidence presented by people, but that’s just rubbish. They make all of their decisions to cut benefits ANY way they can, including by misrepresenting the facts, and then hope people don’t get as far as appeal. Indeed the MR makes it difficult to proceed to appeal, that’s why it was introduced in the first place. Let us know how you get on, Susan.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s