The government spend a lot of time denying that their welfare policies have any harmful consequences on citizens’ lives. However, an outspoken Conservative minister has remarkably all but admitted that policy choices by the Conservatives are at least partly responsible for record levels of homelessness and rough sleeping, particularly those policies related to Housing Benefit.
The Housing Secretary, James Brokenshire (pictured above), has admitted that policies may have “played a role” in rising levels of homelessness. He made the confession in an interview published on the Politico website on Christmas Eve, in an apparent U-turn on his previous comments, in which he insisted that austerity is not to blame for the current homelessness epidemic.
In an interview with the Guardian, Brokenshire had previously dismissed claims that government policies, including cuts to social security benefits, are fueling the rise in the numbers of households who are subjected to eviction orders and extreme poverty.
But in his latest interview, Brokenshire accepted that the UK government “need to ask ourselves some very hard questions” about policy choices and how those choices have impacted on some of the poorest members of society.
This apparent rethink follows the tragic death of rough sleeper Gyula Remes, who collapsed and died just yards from the Houses of Parliament, prompting a Labour MP to tweet: “There is something rotten in Westminster when MPs walk past dying homeless people on their way to work.”
Brokenshire had previously argued that record levels of homelessness seen in the last five years are a result of a “combination of concerning elements in terms of addiction, family breakdown issues”.
Generally, government ministers respond to legitimate concerns raised regarding the harmful consequences of their programme of social security cuts by either blaming those affected; citing some assumed personal failing or character deficit, circumstantial events or attitudinal barriers, or they accuse those voicing concerns and citing case examples of negative policy impacts as “scaremongers”.
Yet the government’s own data shows that since 2014, the loss of a private tenancy has been the biggest cause of homelessness in England. According to research by Generation Rent, 94% of this rise can be blamed on ‘no-fault evictions’, which have more than doubled since 2010. The precariousness of private sector tenancies, combined with a chronic shortage of social housing, punitive welfare reforms and successive years of cuts to homelessness prevention services, have created a ‘perfect storm.’
When asked by Politico, however, if Government policies have attributed to rising levels of homelessness, Brokenshire admitted: “We do have to look and reflect on ourselves as to the increase.
“Yes there are other factors that are relevant here, but we have to look at the policy.”
We have to ask ourselves “some very hard questions … for example in relation to the introduction of changes to welfare”, he added, and also “whether we’ve done enough [to mitigate the damages].”
Although Brokenshire has appeared to shrug off any suggestion that government policies since 2010 might be to blame, on the Today programme over the Christmas holidays, former Chancellor George Osborne went much further and insisted austerity – which included brutal cuts to welfare payments, local authority budgets, public health spending, the police, other public services and the ministry of justice – has played no part whatsoever.
In the exclusive interview with Politico, Brokenshire says: “The death of 43-year-old Gyula Remes came as a shock in Westminster, where workers have got used to walking past up to half a dozen homeless people every day.
“It’s a stark reminder that what we’re talking about is individual lives.”
Brokenshire added: “I share the feelings that everybody has, of shock and distress in knowing this individual had lost his life.”
He is reluctant to comment on the specific case – a Westminster Council review is underway – but insists that accommodation had previously been offered to all the people sleeping rough.
“There’d been a lot of help and support offered. Offers of accommodation had been made. Some people had taken them up … [But] it’s a fact that in a number of cases, the roof over the head may well be there but for a number of reasons the rough sleeper may not be willing to take up that help.
“It is certainly not from my perspective saying they are somehow to blame, as some have tried to portray this as — that is profoundly not what I am saying. It’s about compassion and support … It’s complicated because of some of the real challenges of mental health and addiction.”
The first ever official figures on the number of homeless people who have tragically died were recently published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS).
The figures reveal that nearly 600 homeless people died in 2017, with more than half of those deaths attributed to alcohol, drug abuse, or suicide.
Ben Humberstone, head of health analysis at the ONS, said: “What’s striking about these figures is how different they are to the general population – 55% of the deaths of homeless people are related to drugs, suicide or alcohol, also known as the diseases of despair, compared to just 3% of deaths from these causes among the general population.”
However, we must not conflate causes with effects. The statistical data does not tell us whether those 55% of deaths – related to substance misuse or suicide – would have happened had the citizens concerned not been pushed into destitution, or whether poor mental health and substance misuse contributed to people becoming homeless in the first place. Government statistics show that private sector tenancies coming to an end are the leading cause of homelessness, coupled with low wages and cuts to welfare and delays in payments, leading to insurmountable rent arrears, in both public and private sector housing.
Previously, Brokenshire is on record denying that government cuts have created the spike in homelessness statistics, saying: “I don’t see it in those terms.” He said. “I see it as a combination of concerning elements in terms of addiction, family breakdown issues. The thing that struck me over recent months in speaking to some of the LGBT charities in terms of young people, because of their sexuality, being thrown out of home.”
Labour’s Shadow Housing Minister Melanie Onn MP said: “These figures are utterly shameful and reflect a complete failure of Conservative policy on housing, which has seen rough sleeping skyrocket since 2010.
“We are one of the richest countries in the world and there is no excuse for people dying on our streets.
“Labour will provide £100m to ensure that everyone has shelter when it becomes dangerously cold.
“We will end rough sleeping within five years to ensure that everyone has a place to call home.”
The Conservatives reiterated their pledge to eradicate rough sleeping by 2027. Brokenshire said that work was under way with the Work and Pensions Secretary, Amber Rudd, to “assess where problems were”.
Brokenshire also revealed that although he personally does not give money to homeless people, he said he buys the Big Issue when he can.
8 thoughts on “Housing Secretary admits government policies may have contributed to rising homelessness”
one thing thats struck me is this. they blame family breakdown issues for homelessness. yet they insist on putting single older people in 1 bedroomed places. flats/bungalows.as well as young people… when a family member has issues like the ones forcing people out on the street ,in the past when we all had a house not a 1 bed mousehole of a place with no room to swing a cat, let alone storage for our own things.we could have helped others easily.. we cant help our family when they hit rock bottom like that.my immediate family consists of me, my daughter and my son. each one of us is in a one bedroomed place. i have most storage space and its slightly bigger here than either of my kids. my daughter has the tiniest of cupboards under stairs leading to flat above. you have to bend double to get into it.small kitchen with only just enough room to store food for a week. plus a few extra tinned goods. nowhere in bathroom to put shelves for towels.etc. its ridiculous the space allocated for 1 person. and yet they say 2 people living together can live in one of those flats. i have same number of rooms and my rent book says i can have 3 people living here. me and 2 others. exactly where i dont know unless someone dosses down on the floor. my settee is impossible to sleep on.its for an older disabled person. 2 seater only…. if they allowed us extra bedrooms we could easily take in one homeless person. but nope. we arent allowed. to even have a 2 bedroomed place, not even if we need a live in carer. absolutely stupid.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Only a Tory government could tax the sleeping space in someone’s home. It’s as if they resent the poorest citizens having anything at all. They’ll be taxing windows and doors next… Miserable, mean spirited, wretched, elitist psychopaths
LikeLiked by 1 person
Quick, brick up those windows! Isn’t that what they did way back when?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep!. Only the Tories would resent poor people light and space
I myself at the age of 40 have found myself in a situation where my landlord sold my flat in October to receive no help from the local council and subsequently to a room above a pub through a friend of a friend which was supposed to be a temporary arrangement until my new privately rented place was ready for me in November. I was then made redundant from my job in October so could not take the rented property I planned to move to due to them not accepting benifits. I claimed universal credit not knowing that I could claim housing costs for the room I was living in. It was advised at my first appointment that I could so subsequently followed their advice and got a letter from the landlady of the pub stating I was renting a room. Now because when I initially moved it I was technically living rent free because it was supposed to be a temporary arrangement but buying food and such for us all. They have now refused my claim for housing costs 3 times. The landlady obviously can not let me stay rent free forever as I am using gas electric and water. Like I said this was never supposed to be long term and she was doing me a favour for a couple of months. The landlady has a baby due any time now and I wasn’t supposed to still be here. I am now in a situation where I cannot pay her any rent and afford to eat on £317.00 (a month £234.00 after advance deductions). And I am facing being homeless with no help from anywhere or anyone. The council have basically said I need to go to them on the day she kicks me out and they will try and do something other than that tough! … it makes me sick that people who sit in the benifits system for their whole adult life get houses and benefits without a problem but myself who is going to be genuinely homeless through no fault of my own is just another number!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very very few people ‘sit’ in the benefits system ‘their whole life’. I have children, and when I became too ill to work, I lost my house. Both boys were still at school. The council said the same to me – that once I was on the streets with two children, they would then consider helping me. I found a place to rent myself, got a small loan for a month’s rent in advance from Provident, and moved just down the road. I was very poorly at the time with lupus. I was also made homeless through no fault of my own, but I rather suspect that most people facing difficult circumstances that we have are also not at fault.
People don’t get houses any more, because there are none. Those who did get houses years ago, well many of them lost them because of bedroom tax and other cuts to their support. Disabled people included.
I very much hope you get sorted out with some help and support.
The Nasty Party still attempting to deny their vindictive cruelty.