An open letter to the Chief Rabbi from an Imam, about Jeremy Corbyn

See here for source:  An open letter to the Chief Rabbi about Jeremy Corbyn from Imam Ajmal Masroor

Dear Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis

My name is Ajmal Masroor. I have been an Imam for almost 30 years and I write to you today as your brother in faith and humanity.

I proudly practice Islam in our multicultural and multi-faith country, without fear or prejudice, despite the rising levels of Islamophobia. I take a keen interest in politics and believe in actively influencing change, which is why I stood for Parliament twice – once in 2010 and again in 2018.

I believe people of faith must play an active role in all aspects of our society, including politics. As such, I welcome your letter to The Times, where you urge us to vote with our conscience. Both our Jewish and Islamic traditions place conscience at the core of our Godly life on this Earth. I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for reminding us of our innate, God-gifted tool: the conscience.

However, I vehemently disagree with the rest of your assertions, where you suggest that Jeremy Corbyn is unfit to be our next Prime Minister. You blame Jeremy Corbyn personally for the antisemitic behaviour of Labour Party members. In my humble opinion, you have made a severe error of judgment in calling Jeremy Corbyn unfit to be our Prime Minister. Before I express why, do you believe that Boris Johnson is more fit to be our Prime Minister?

In the upcoming general election, we are limited in our choices. We know that the Liberal Democrats will never achieve enough support to win the election. We are left with a choice between the Conservative party and the Labour party. Under the Conservative party, our country has witnessed unprecedented levels of poverty, inequality, austerity, homelessness and division. The Conservative party has sold its soul to Nigel Farage’s UKIP, and now Brexit party. The true moderate and centre ground Conservative politicians have been pushed out or side-lined by the extremists within this party. If your assertion is that Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour should not be supported, are you endorsing the Conservative party, that is deeply hostile to the multicultural and multi-faith fabric of our society? Inadvertently, are you telling the Jewish community to vote for a deeply Islamophobic party? Is this your idea of voting with our conscience?

We are men of faith, and you will agree that the practise of double standards in all faiths is abhorrent. When I read about your selective outrage – calling out the Labour party for its failure to stamp out antisemitism – while turning a blind eye to the Conservative party’s Islamophobia, I felt deeply disappointed. Antisemitism is evil and we should all stand against it with all our might. Islamophobia is also evil, and we should equally stand against it. I find it deeply hypocritical when people do not observe fairness and consistency when struggling against all kinds of evil. In Judaism, as in Islam, justice and fair dealings are considered closest to Godliness. Sadly, your letter did not display justice or fairness towards Jeremy Corbyn, and instead came across as a cheap attempt at political posturing.

If I was told to choose between a lying, philandering and narcissistic clown and a truthful, principled and humble socialist, my choice would be easy. I would never entrust the future of our country to the hands of a man who is an occupational liar. I would never ask the people of our country to vote for a man who makes a mockery of clean and principled politics. The only thing Boris Johnson is interested in is himself; not our country, and certainly not community cohesion.

Jeremy Corbyn has a forty year track record of selfless service to his constituency and the absolute interest of all people in our country. He has always been a genuine friend of the minorities, disadvantaged and vulnerable. Why would you suggest that he was unfit for the Prime Minister’s office?

What is Jeremy Corbyn’s actual crime that has led you to deeming him unfit for the job? Has Jeremy Corbyn personally been accused of antisemitism? The answer is an emphatic ‘no’! He has never been accused of antisemitism.

On the other hand, Boris Johnson has made many inflammatory and deeply offensive remarks about Islam and Muslim women, including citing Islam as the reason for backwardness, violence and economic degeneration within the Muslim communities. He has also likened Muslim women, who wear face covering, to “bank robbers” and “letter boxes”. In the week of his remark, anti-Muslim hate crime spiked by more than 300%. And he hasn’t stopped at the Muslim community alone. His opinion and remarks on minority communities has been abhorrent, including saying he was afraid of black men; that black people were “piccaninnies” with “watermelon smiles”, and referred to gay men as “bum boys”. Is this the rhetoric you expect from the leader of our country?

I know the Labour party is accused of antisemitism, and the UK human rights commission is currently investigating it. I pray the investigation is thorough and where strands of antisemitism are identified, that they are promptly and swiftly removed and publicly admonished. But surely you would agree that the Conservative party should also be investigated for Islamophobia. Allegation alone is not enough for faith leaders like us to charge entire parties. Our claims must be substantiated, with credible evidence, and then we must wait for investigations to completed and for those findings to be made public. Both of our religious traditions have a rich, ethical parameter on how to deal with accusations, and how to challenge hatred. I am saddened to say that I believe you have violated this very principle by adding further fuel to an allegation; an act that is not only irresponsible but astoundingly dangerous in the middle of the most important election of our time.

I have always respected you as a man of faith and expected you to adhere to a higher standard of moral and ethical probity. I did not expect your high office to be compromised by spreading aspersions on Jeremy Corbyn. By doing so, you have become actively involved in what is essentially a smear campaign against Jeremy Corbyn, who has never been antisemitic in his life. The plain truth is that there are numerous accounts of Jeremy Corbyn championing all forms of campaigns to eradicate hate crime from our society, including standing up for the rights of our Jewish communities in and around the UK. He has equally championed the right of the Palestinians too. He has recognised failings within the party, taken responsibility for these, offered an apology and vowed to do better. He has been honest and upright, and as a man of faith, I would expect you to follow suit.

Your statement carries with it a grave dishonesty, and I am deeply disappointed by it. In a time of political and social crisis across the world, let us adhere to honesty first and foremost. And in this very spirit, let me ask you: have you called Jeremy Corbyn antisemitic because he has been critical of the Israeli government’s policy of occupation, expansion of illegal settlements and dehumanisation of the Palestinian people? Using your pulpit to broadcast the same message as those who have weaponised antisemitism is plainly irresponsible.

It beggar’s belief that you would find criticism of Israel or its political ideology of Zionism as antisemitism. No state or political ideology is beyond reproach. You falsely labelling Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-Semite will not silence people, nor will it deter people from standing up against Israeli aggression and violence against the Palestinian people.

It pains me to know that as a man of faith first and foremost, you have been a clear supporter of the Israeli government’s aggression against the Palestinian people. In August 2014, you wrote that Israel had “understandably and justifiably defended her citizens” by taking disproportionate and indiscriminate military action in Gaza, killing innocent men, women and children. Israel continues its illegal policies of assassination, destruction of Palestinian homes, confiscation of Palestinian people’s land, occupation, collective punishment and keeps an iron fist around the Palestinian people’s right to freely move – even within their own areas. It has built the disgraceful apartheid wall and it steals water from the Palestinians and then sells it back to the Palestinians. You have remained silent about the state-sponsored injustices perpetrated by Israel, and now you are criticising Jeremy Corbyn of anti-Semitism for championing the rights of Palestinians.

You have been a supporter of Benyamin Netanyahu, who has been convicted on many corruption charges, including fraud, breach of trust and bribery. You have no moral authority to lecture us on how Jeremy Corbyn is unfit to be the Prime Minister of our country. You have politicised your spiritual position to influence voters and I believe this is totally wrong. You are abusing your office to silence criticism of Israel, and that too is totally wrong. As a man of faith, you should know better.

If we believe that as men of faith, we should be leading our communities in the way of honesty and integrity, I would urge you to reconsider your position. Our people deserve better; we can and should be better.

Your brother in faith,
Imam Ajmal Masroor
London

@chiefrabbi

Jeremy Corbyn

 

Image may contain: 2 people, people smiling, beard and closeup

A note of clarity: The Labour party is not being investigated “for antisemitism.” The inquiry is focused on the complaints procedure and processes the party uses in addressing allegations and complaints, to ensure they are effective. Other strands of the inquiry will also examine how the party has adopted recommendations, for example, in the Chakrabarty report, among others. This inquiry will take place within the framework of compliance with the Equality Act.

Kitty.


I  don’t make any money from my work. But you can help if you like by making a donation to help me continue to research and write free, informative, insightful and independent articles, and to provide support to others. The smallest amount is much appreciated – thank you.

DonatenowButton


11 thoughts on “An open letter to the Chief Rabbi from an Imam, about Jeremy Corbyn

  1. The gentle Imam has bent over backwards to be civilised in his critique of Ephraim Mirvis. If only the Tory supporting Chief Rabbi was worthy of such treatment. This is a man who unashamedly applies the Tebbit test to Black Britons and other ethnic minorities. Under this test simply supporting the West Indies cricket team apparently invalidates your Britishness, while the IHRC ‘definition’ asserts that giving your allegiance to foreign Apartheid government should be beyond question. Hypocrisy!!!
    See link – https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/12189152/Minorities-must-pass-the-Norman-Tebbit-test-Chief-Rabbi.html

    Like

  2. An interesting Letter. I am Skeptical of any Binary reduction and noticeably the Good Imman has not mentioned Christians or Faith Groupings outside of Judaism, Islam. Not one for whataboutery, though. The Imans Letter is a strong one within its own terms and the Rabbi’s intervention was Polemical and beneath that position which he holds.
    https://notthegrubstreetjournal.com/2017/05/25/last-night-in-lambeth-terrorism-rape-politics-and-religion-a-guide-for-the-perplexed-london-bridge-and-bourough-market-murders/
    Lytton Crosby’s surrogates are very much in evidence in 2019, he recommends the Candidates to rise above the fray and to have others make personal attacks, of course, many candidates can not help themselves.

    In 2017 I found the Labour Party position much more credible than 2019. The Coup attempts against Jeremy Corbyn and the constitution of his shadow cabinet suggest that the Blairite influence is not far from the helm. As I hold very similar views to the Vintage Corbyn on the EU, along with Tony Benn and currently well expressed by Eddie Dempsey and Paul Embury the Brexit påosition of 2019 is not credible to me. Jeremy Corbyn’s own position does actually make sense and I do think actually is one that the Public understands even through the mists of media outrage.
    Memories these days are very short, certainly, commentary tends to have a very strict and selective preference for leaving almost everything form the past firmly memory-holed.
    Anyway here’s my take on Why a Jeremy Corbyn Brexit would be better than a Johnstone Brino,
    https://notthegrubstreetjournal.com/2019/11/30/corbyns-rover-p5b-brexit-lexit-jexit-or-boriss-brino-executive-coach-dressed-up-in-del-boys-reliant-robin-cheek-not-such-a-tough-choice-now-cobra-brendancox-peajackets-peasinapod-twofingers2/

    although the Full 2017 Jexit would I think to be more of a vote winner. The European Union is a neoliberal project certainly since Maastricht when it went full federated Neo-Liberal, as such it seems that the best hope for democratic socialists and social democracy is that the UK leads the way out of the neoliberal European wilderness with a more socially based and inclusive model of political economy rather than seeing that inevitability lead by more authoritarian and so-called Hard RIght groupings. I say so-called hard right as I do think Neo-Liberalism is Fascist in Nature, Pinochet was a Fascist ( does anyone argue against that?) Pinochet was the Chicago Boys Lab rat in Chile?

    I have no idea how this Blog popped up in my feed today, it is obviously of far too high a quality by my own lights, to not be comprehensively shadowbanned, I wonder if Kitty, has seen a drop of in readers since last Autumn 2018? As ever when I stumble upon great commentary and analysis I fill my boots, read as much as possible and hang around. So Just to say Hi To Kitty and other readers.

    Not sure how many here were regular commenters from Sturdy Blog and Golem XIV back in the 2010-2013 period , WIll no doubt see as I work though some more articles.

    Greetings and Salutations from Sweden ( I live here) CHeers Rog

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Reblogged this on Not The Grub Street Journal and commented:
    An interesting Letter. I am Skeptical of any Binary reduction and noticeably the Good Imman has not mentioned Christians or Faith Groupings outside of Judaism, Islam. Not one for whataboutery, though. The Imans Letter is a strong one within its own terms and the Rabbi’s intervention was Polemical and beneath that position which he holds. https://notthegrubstreetjournal.com/2017/05/25/last-night-in-lambeth-terrorism-rape-politics-and-religion-a-guide-for-the-perplexed-london-bridge-and-bourough-market-murders/ Lytton Crosby’s surrogates are very much in evidence in 2019, he recommends the Candidates to rise above the fray and to have others make personal attacks, of course, many candidates can not help themselves. In 2017 I found the Labour Party position much more credible than 2019. The Coup attempts against Jeremy Corbyn and the constitution of his shadow cabinet suggest that the Blairite influence is not far from the helm. As I hold very similar views to the Vintage Corbyn on the EU, along with Tony Benn and currently well expressed by Eddie Dempsey and Paul Embury the Brexit påosition of 2019 is not credible to me. Jeremy Corbyn’s own position does actually make sense and I do think actually is one that the Public understands even through the mists of media outrage. Memories these days are very short, certainly, commentary tends to have a very strict and selective preference for leaving almost everything form the past firmly memory-holed. Anyway here’s my take on Why a Jeremy Corbyn Brexit would be better than a Johnstone Brino, https://notthegrubstreetjournal.com/2019/11/30/corbyns-rover-p5b-brexit-lexit-jexit-or-boriss-brino-executive-coach-dressed-up-in-del-boys-reliant-robin-cheek-not-such-a-tough-choice-now-cobra-brendancox-peajackets-peasinapod-twofingers2/ although the Full 2017 Jexit would I think to be more of a vote winner. The European Union is a neoliberal project certainly since Maastricht when it went full federated Neo-Liberal, as such it seems that the best hope for democratic socialists and social democracy is that the UK leads the way out of the neoliberal European wilderness with a more socially based and inclusive model of political economy rather than seeing that inevitability lead by more authoritarian and so-called Hard RIght groupings. I say so-called hard right as I do think Neo-Liberalism is Fascist in Nature, Pinochet was a Fascist ( does anyone argue against that?) Pinochet was the Chicago Boys Lab rat in Chile? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Nqwt38huoQ https://youtu.be/HBfdJLl0QNc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tieecEqoAQI I have no idea how this Blog popped up in my feed today, it is obviously of far too high a quality by my own lights, to not be comprehensively shadowbanned, I wonder if Kitty, has seen a drop of in readers since last Autumn 2018? As ever when I stumble upon great commentary and analysis I fill my boots, read as much as possible and hang around. So Just to say Hi To Kitty and other readers. Not sure how many here were regular commenters from Sturdy Blog and Golem XIV back in the 2010-2013 period , WIll no doubt see as I work though some more articles. Greetings and Salutations from Sweden ( I live here) CHeers Rog

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s