My response to the Conservative Chairman’s invitation to join the Conservative party

Image result for Tory psychographic profilingAn example of audience segmenting, according to a psychographics methodology. I wonder what category data analysts think that I fit into. Whichever it is, they most definitely got me wrong. Note the dehumanising labels (objectification: “the struggler, “the resigned”) and stereotyping. I struggle on little income, don’t consume junk food or very much alcohol, though I have an occasional glass of red wine with a meal. I’m not aimless, I have academic qualifications, but no physical skills as I am disabled because of an illness. I am certainly someone who fits with “the reformer” description but I am not “at the leading edge of society”.  

Psychology has always been used as a tool for political manipulation, particularly in authoritarian regimes. Psychographics uses ‘personality type’ to predict behaviour. The data is gathered from online activity, surveys and other sources. It is then analysed and segmented. Strategic communications are then tailored to fit with each category. For example, those identified as having traits of anxiety may be targeted with political messages aimed at generating fear. Those with materialistic traits may be targeted with political messages about promised tax cuts, and those with progressive tendencies may get a political message claiming that public services are valued and public sector workers are going to have a pay raise after almost a decade of exploitatively low pay.

It’s not a brand-new concept; in the documentary Century of the Self, Adam Curtis shows how researchers from the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) used psychology to understand personality types and so predict political behaviour of the US public during the 1980s. The SRI sent out a huge survey to build an understanding of personal motivations. Strategic political communications are tailored to fit the profiled ‘audience segments.’ 

What is interesting about this is a friend of mine also had an email asking him to join the Conservative party, but his message was rather more about generating fears regarding a future Labour government. My friend suffers from an anxiety disorder. I think it is highly likely the Conservatives are using psychographics and microtargeting techniques. This would certainly fit with the profiles of companies that the government hire for their election campaigns.

I received the following email from Brandon Lewis, the Conservative Chairman, today. I have set out (and sent) my response below:

Dear Sue,
Today we’ve announced the biggest public sector pay rise in almost a decade, recognising the vital work that teachers, the police, our armed forces, prison officers, doctors and dentists do. 
  • This year an early career teacher will get a pay rise of £800.
  • A typical police constable will see £760 a year more.
  • The average soldier will get a £680 pay increase, plus a one-off payment of £300 this year.
This has only been possible because of our balanced approach to the public finances.
Getting debt falling, while investing in our vital services and keeping taxes low.
Backing businesses to help to grow our economy and pay the taxes which fund our public services.
Agree with our decision to increase pay for our dedicated public-sector workers? Then join the Conservative Party today.
These pay rises couldn’t have happened under a Labour government because they don’t know how to handle the economy.
Labour would mean more debt, higher taxes, fewer jobs – and less money available for our public services.
Yours sincerely,
Brandon Lewis, The Rt. Hon. Brandon Lewis MP
Conservative Party Chairman 

My response:

Dear Brandon, 

It’s not enough to adopt progressive language, as that simply attempts to muddy the waters and target persuasive, nudge type at progressives like me with blatant lies. No matter how you try to dress this appeal, your lies are still are still lies. I am not persuaded by this superficial and glib ‘strategic communication’ from you. Your policies are still draconian and have been for the past seven years. Nothing you say to me, no matter how carefully constructed, will change either your authoritarian policies or the wake of terrible consequences of those harmful and socially damaging policies.

A Labour government would never treat our public sectors so badly. You say that this is the biggest public sector pay rise in almost a decade, and also, that you value our public sector workers’ vital work. This is a contradiction, because if you genuinely recognised and valued that vital work, you would not have waited almost a decade to reward that work. Under your government, we have witnessed hard-working nurses having to rely on food banks. We have seen doctors, nurses and other medical professionals striking in protest of their poor pay and conditions. When a government truly values public sector workers, they don’t have a need to strike and protest.

As for Labour not knowing how to handle an economy, well I must disagree. When you took office, may I remind you that the last Labour government had steered the UK out of the global recession by the last quarter of 2009. Your government put us back in recession in 2011 with your ill-conceived austerity programme, which shrunk the economy and led to those you targeted with the unfairest of burdens of cuts suffering so you could hand out tax cuts to the millionaires.

As of Q1 (the first quarter of) 2018, UK government debt amounted to £1.78 trillion, or 86.58% of total GDP, at which time the annual cost of servicing (paying the interest) the public debt amounted to around £48 billion (which is roughly 4% of GDP or 8% of UK government tax income.

For a government that platformed itself on the idea of economic competence, promising to eliminate the deficit, I have to say the reality does not match your rhetoric. You stated in 2010 that you would eliminate the deficit by the 2015/16, and by 2014, admitted that the structural deficit would not be eliminated until the financial year 2017/18. This forecast was also pushed back to 2018/19 in March 2015, and then again to 2019/20 in July 2015, before the target of a return to surplus at any particular time was finally abandoned by the then Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne in July 2016.

It was a Tory-led government that lost the Moody’s Investors Service triple A grade, despite your pledges to keep it secure. Moody’s credit ratings represent a rank-ordering of creditworthiness, or expected loss. The Fitch credit rating was also downgraded due to increased borrowing by the Tories, who have borrowed more in 8 years than Labour did in 13. In fact it has been said that since 2010, your government has borrowed more than every Labour government combined. Quite an achievement.

The Conservatives have seized an opportunity to dismantle the institutions you have always hated since the post-war social democratic settlement – institutions of health, welfare, education, culture and human rights which should be provided for all citizens. . Offering and inflicting only regressive policies and devastating cuts, the your party lies you dismantle our social democracy, our public services, fundamental rights and the very basis of our basic civilisation.

Furthermore, the Conservatives have a track record of mismanaging the UK economy. Thatcher and Major also caused recessions in the UK, these were not because of global conditions, but because of their policies. 

Tell me, what is the point of a government in an “economically stable”and wealthy first world country that does not ensure that all citizens can meet their basic needs, and that fails to observe and fulfil basic human rights obligations?

Finally I draw your attention to the growing numbers of people living in poverty, with more than half of those people in work. Whatever your notion of a growing economy actually is, we don’t share it, because we expect that citizens actually benefit from a growing economy, rather than propping it up for the wealthy few.

Meanwhile your government have blatantly and systematically violated the human rights of disabled people, among other groups, and now you claim that the economy has grown, you still have yet to remedy the harm and distress caused to those of us on the receiving end of your draconian policies which are founded on traditional Conservative prejudices against historically marginalised groups. 

A growing economy is of no value to ordinary people when its benefits are hoarded by the very wealthiest minority, when public our wealth is transformed into private profit and placed offshore, leaving a large hole in our economy, that your own government attempts to fill by imposing more and more cuts on those with the very least. 

I have over 700 pieces of work that documents your policies and the consequences of those, collated from my own research, other academic research, and importantly, from citizens’ own accounts. Let me know if you want me to present you with this evidence of how your government has seriously mismanaged the economy and public funds, though as a government that claims to be accountable, to date you have shown a remarkable and  woeful disinterest in serious challenges to your neoliberal dogma, with its incompatibility to established human rights frameworks and democracy. Your answer to a failing neoliberal system is to apply even more aggressive neoliberal policies. Those policies are killing people, causing distress and suffering. That is inexcusable.

I am a Labour party member. I support Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour party, and will be continuing to campaign for a Labour government, and to vote for the many, not the few.

Very sincerely,
and in considerable restraint,

Sue Jones

Related image


I don’t make any money from my work. I am disabled and don’t have any paid employment. But you can contribute by making a donation and help me continue to research and write informative, insightful and independent articles, and to provide support to others. The smallest amount is much appreciated – thank you.

DonatenowButton

28 thoughts on “My response to the Conservative Chairman’s invitation to join the Conservative party

  1. I would be more likely to join a bunch of Satanists. Your party had been a blight on this country for 200 years and now it has become a sick joke. Badly led full of opportunists and socially illiterate public schoolboys.
    Time the whole nasty enterprise went into liquidation.
    As for the figures above they represent such fraud that it would be hard to know where to begin. Austerity was a stupid, economically illiterate policy which has allowed growth and trebled debt.

    Liked by 4 people

  2. well said Kitty… if i get a similar email i now know what to send them.can i quote from yours? cant see me getting one but you never know/have had emails in past from all the parties at different timers.. but you coudnt have put it better well done.

    Liked by 3 people

      1. Tongue wedged in cheek. I sustain the hope that the spin doctors and psych gurus couldn’t suss out the motivation of a flea, and seriously underestimate their targets.

        Like

  3. Clear, unambiguous, accurate and respectful in tone. A wonderful letter and I hope it is read by Mr Lewis with care and attention. Since the Tories repeatedly fail to be held to public account direct communications such as this are the only way to let them know that we see them, their lies and what they are doing. Well done.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Thanks, Roisin. Yes they refuse to hold dialogue with ordinary citizens, yet the wealthiest citizens have endless access to ministers, their time and attention via lobbyists. That’s not anything like a democracy. It’s just a facade of one.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. i wish I get a email from brandon like that I would so love to write him a letter and as for joining the conservatives I rather go sailing without a lifejacket in a boat with holes in it

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Despite your own very serious chronic illness, which I know can be extremely disabling and life threatening, meaning you are hospitalised on many occasions, I admire and thank you Kitty for using your prolific, well written and well researched articles to raise awareness about injustice and what is happening to our most vulnerable citizens in a supposed civilised country, with great wealth and resources.

    It shocks me to the core that those who are elected to represent us create policies that can cause so much hardship and misery to so many, particularly when they find themselves needing the most support.

    It upsets me profoundly that more people who are ‘able’ do not speak up on behalf of the sick, the disabled, the young, the old, the hungry, the homeless, the displaced, the marginalised, the neglected and abandoned.

    It frightens me that those who are more fortunate and lead healthier and wealthier lives ignore, deny or are indifferent to their plight.

    It worries me that some people literally step over them in the street, where many have died and worse still blame them for the desperate situation they find themselves in, actually stating and I quote, ‘ this is a life style choice!’

    It is worth remembering we are all one accident, one illness, one major loss or more of some kind, from finding ourselves in extreme difficulties. The young guy interviewed on TV, living on the streets, lost his job, lost his partner who left him, lost his mum who died, lost his own mental health, all in that order.

    If we do not consider the common good and speak out about injustice and on behalf of those who have lost their ability to care for themselves, then we cannot call ourselves civilised, moral or compassionate and our society/ world will be a hostile, uncertain and terrifying place to live.

    So thank you for continuing to be such an inspirational writer and human being.
    I am very proud to know you.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I am proud to know you, Suzanne. Your comment speaks out about injustices, it shows your own wonderful compassion and states so clearly the problems we face as a society, which is riven with toxic division, ‘us and them’ views and complete indifference and apathy by those few who benefit from the socieconomic system – the same one that systematically fails the majority.

      Your comment here should be captured in an article, it’s so clear and well said. It is also inspiring because it reaches out with such clarity to others, to inspire and invite them to also speak out, in solidarity. That is precisely what is needed before anything can change for the better.

      Beautifully said. I’d like to publish the core message later, if that’s ok. I don’t mean the reference to me, I mean the rest because it is so well put. First, I must get some sleep, as I haven’t had any yet.

      In solidarity! XX

      Liked by 1 person

    2. Yes, you speak from the heart with true compassion for humanity. It really is so simple. Treat people as you would like to be treated yourself. I wonder constantly at how so many humans go about their daily business so wrapped up in their own importance without consideration for others and without acknowledging how life can very quickly bite you on the bum!

      Kitty – I love all your posts, and as a PhD student I often start my research reading following on from a point you have made or an issue you have highlighted. Here is my research website if you are interested:

      http://www.disabledpeopleworksmes.wordpress.com

      Best wishes

      Cara

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Hi Cara. Thank you. It’s great that my posts have relevance to others and are useful. Too few people consider the circumstances of politically and economically marginalised groups, and that’s a lot to do with divisive political narratives that scapegoat others and de-sensitise the public, by using dehumanising language. I read that you can’t teach psychopaths how to empathise, but you can switch empathic people off, by using outgrouping and exclusion, dehumanising narratives and metaphors.

        Of course I am interested in your work. Thank you very much for posting it here.

        I will read it, though after today I’m going to be off for a couple of weeks for a family holiday, which is very much needed. Although I’m not setting off for another couple of days, I have to get organised, plus I have a health appointment tomorrow. I’ll start reading now.

        I’m looking forward 🙂

        Best wishes and speak soon,

        Sue

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s